Hi there,
I am slightly confused as to why AdvancedInstaller attempts to install an OCX after instructing that the file requires registration? What is the benefit of this?
Unfortunately I have an OCX that registers perfectly using regsvr32.exe, but AdvancedIntaller does not allow me to proceed ...
Suggested Articles
Search found 8 matches
- Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:36 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: DLL Registration
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3985
- Jump to post
- Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:40 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: MSI elevated priviledges
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5744
- Jump to post
Excellent reply
That's a really informative excellent reply. Thank you that has really cleared up a few things in my head 
Cheers!
Cheers!- Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:45 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: MSI elevated priviledges
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5744
- Jump to post
MSI elevated priviledges
Hi there,
My understanding is that an MSI script is run at elevalted priviedges in order to get it to install on a limited account. One thing I am unsure of though is whether a custom action such as an EXE run at the end of the installation process is also run at the same priviledge level?
My ...
My understanding is that an MSI script is run at elevalted priviedges in order to get it to install on a limited account. One thing I am unsure of though is whether a custom action such as an EXE run at the end of the installation process is also run at the same priviledge level?
My ...
- Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:33 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: File association with more than 1 application
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5758
- Jump to post
File association with more than 1 application
Hi there,
Would I be right in saying that you cant associate an extension with more than 1 application at the moment? For example your application might use a different exe for viewing a file than editing it. Currently it seems to send everything to just 1 exe.
If not it would be a great feature ...
Would I be right in saying that you cant associate an extension with more than 1 application at the moment? For example your application might use a different exe for viewing a file than editing it. Currently it seems to send everything to just 1 exe.
If not it would be a great feature ...
- Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:51 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: 3.6 Migration issues
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3439
- Jump to post
3.6 Migration issues
Hi there,
Unfortunately I am having great difficulty attempting to upgrade a 3.4 project to the latest 3.6 version of advanced installer. When loading the project I recieve the following error...
Exception - A row with this key [id APPDIR\<filename>] was already registered in the table.
I have ...
Unfortunately I am having great difficulty attempting to upgrade a 3.4 project to the latest 3.6 version of advanced installer. When loading the project I recieve the following error...
Exception - A row with this key [id APPDIR\<filename>] was already registered in the table.
I have ...
- Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:44 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Auto register order of DLL's
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6280
- Jump to post
- Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:23 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Auto register order of DLL's
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6280
- Jump to post
Auto register order of DLL's
Hi there,
I'm currently "auto registering" 1 ActiveX DLL in an Advanced Installer project. I am going to need to register serveral more DLL's in the same way, but unfortunately these need to be registered in a specific order.
How would I specify the order of registration for these files?
I am ...
I'm currently "auto registering" 1 ActiveX DLL in an Advanced Installer project. I am going to need to register serveral more DLL's in the same way, but unfortunately these need to be registered in a specific order.
How would I specify the order of registration for these files?
I am ...
- Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:14 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Custom Actions - .NET Installer Class
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5481
- Jump to post
Workaround
Hi there Lynne,
One way you can achieve what you are after is by making a seperate .net exe that can launch custom actions via the command line. So basically the EXE takes input of the assembly to install/uninstall and then passes that information to InstallUtil.exe.
It's a bit of a strange work ...
One way you can achieve what you are after is by making a seperate .net exe that can launch custom actions via the command line. So basically the EXE takes input of the assembly to install/uninstall and then passes that information to InstallUtil.exe.
It's a bit of a strange work ...
FOLLOW US